Adapting to these conditions the organization of the individual’s emotional and intellectual resources changes, this changing, adaptive, organization will, however exhibit certain broad continuities with the previously stabilized personality and this change is what anthropological studies call psychological process. This process develops interaction with people such as parents, teachers and peers as cultural agents who are carrying out roles provided by the social system and cultural patterning of their group. These modifies the role of constant adjustments to various situations and as they are interpreted by the individual cultural agent. For example, a developing child encountering these agents identifies with particular persons and specific roles, as perceived through his experience. The child internalizes certain directives structured into these roles and merely acknowledges others. Depending upon theThe role of relationship exists between the individual and these cultural agents. The individual reacts to the directives both as he/ her encounters them and after these directives are internalized. This frequently happens at a “pre-conscious” or “sub verbal” level of interaction within the individual’s psyche. Each reaction is responses to the behavior that the individual perceives in others are the material out of which his personality structure develops. The individual personality is therefore a dynamic and sometimes delicate to equilibrium of forces. Dramatic changes are sometimes possible in this organization because changed conditions call latent forces in the personality. The personality equilibrium is dependent to a large extent upon the kinds and intensity of conflicts in directives to culturally patterned directives is interpreted by the cultural agent’s encounters.The “modal” personality is that organization of emotional and intellectual resources created out of the process of encounter. (Spindler: 1963) The features of this organization that are most relevant and most functional in the specific socio-cultural setting are the greatest interest. These features together the socially required personality” in a group rather than as inferable largely from the “collective policies and products” of social institutions.When it comes to career development decision process cultural values is still the main factors affecting my decision, to be more specific social relationships values have an important role in the career
Arbona, C. (1995). Theory and Research on Racial and Ethnic Minorities: Hispanic Americans. In F. T. L. Leong (Ed.), Career Development and Vocational Behavior of Ethnic and Racial Minorities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 37-66
Brown, D. (1996). Browns Values-based, Holistic Model of Career and Life-Role Choices and Satisfaction. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates, Career Choice and Development. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco. Pp. 337-372.
Hotchkiss, L., & Borow, H. (1996). Sociological Perspective on Work and Career Development. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates, Career Choice and Development. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco
Spindler: George D.(1963). Education and Culture. Rinehart and Winstons: New York City. Pp.353-355.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples