The political environment in America has not been historically favorable for the participation of women especially with the current misrepresentation whereby, the female gender holds least positions in political institutions. For instance, an increase in the number of women in the Senate from 17 to 20 in America is big news and history for women participation in parliament (Parker, 2012). The history of misinterpretation of women in the American politics can be traced back to 90 years ago when Rebecca Felton, from Georgia, was sworn in as the first woman in the USA’s Senate (Steinhauer, 2013). However, the trend has not been impressive for women as such, because, despite the growing interest, they remain inactive in politics.
Although women are celebrating the increase of the female politicians in the Senate, it is highly questionable that they can actually present a new force in the political arena, mainly dominated by the men and the stereotypes towards female gender in workplaces, especially the political arena. In response, political theorists have come up with different explanations for the inactive role of women in politics and one argument that they find intriguing is that the gap in political ambitions between men and females explain why women are least interested in politics (Karpowitz, Mendelberg & Shaker, 2012). Therefore, for it is necessary to argue the passive role of women in politics with reference to political theories as well as some well-known reasons for the low participation of female gender in politics.
From political analysts and theorists, the main reason as to why women are not represented in the US politics is that American women least have political aspirations as men. However, examples have been cited of Carol who as woman defying all odds to flourish in the political arena (Fridkin & Patrick, 2014). For the women who are least interested in politics, they are confined to other duties in society especially playing their gender role, fulfilling family or household chores.
Acker, J. (2011). Women, Work, & Politics: The Political Economy of Gender Inequality. Cooray, A., & Potrafke, N. (2011). Gender inequality in education: Political institutions or culture and religion?. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(2), 268-280.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 40(5), 596-597.
Branisa, B., Klasen, S., & Ziegler, M. (2013). Gender inequality in social institutions and gendered development outcomes. World Development, 45, 252-268.
Fridkin, K. L & Patrick J. K (2014). The Changing Face of Representation: The Gender of US Senators and Constitutent Communications." University of Michigan Press.
Kantor, J. (2013). A Titan’s How-To on Breaking the Glass Ceiling. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/22/us/sheryl-sandberg-lean-in-author-hopes-to-spur-movement.html?smid=pl-share&_r=0
Karpowitz, C. F., Mendelberg, T., & Shaker, L. (2012). Gender inequality in deliberative participation. American Political Science Review, 106(03), 533-547.
Lawless, J & Richard, F (2010). It Still Takes a Candidate. Cambridge University Press.
Murray, R. (2010). Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Womens Campaign for Executive Office. Praeger.
Parker, S (2012, Nov 2012). Women make historic gains in the U.S. Senate. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2012/11/07/women-make-historic-gains-in-the-u-s-senate/
Steinhauer, J. (2013). Once Few, Women Hold More Power in Senate. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/22/us/politics/women-make-new-gains-in-the-senate.html?_r=0
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples