All top leadership positions are chosen by the political parties. The Minority leader serves as the opposition party floor leader, and forms the counterpart to the Leader of the Majority. The minority leader is usually on the ballot, during the House convening, for the Speaker (Theriault, 2006). The party of the Minority leader may control the house, and re-election of all party officers takes place to their seats. The party’s top choice for the speaker for the subsequent House is then the leader of the Minority. The leader of the Minority and the Majority leader usually meets with the Speaker to have discussions over controversial issues agreement.The party leaders have been assigned several responsibilities by the rules of the house. From the institutional perspective, for example, the minority leader has been granted the right to give a motion to recommit with orders. The minority leader may return a motion back to the committee for re-evaluation. The suggestion may not have been debated on well, this requires for further considerations which is usually handled by the minority leader. The selection of the Inspector General is a role of the Minority leader, together with the Speaker and the Majority Leader as required by the law. The three parties are therefore engaged in maximum consultation. The Minority leader therefore discusses with the party members and carries the party decision to recommendations with the Speaker and the Majority Leader (McAllister, 2007).On placing the legislation on Corrections Calendar, the law requires the Speaker to discuss with the Minority Leader. The speaker after discussions will place hardly targeted bills and bipartisan made to tackle particular problems with federal regulations, rules, court decisions and statutory laws. There are also the duties of providing appointments to people of various federal entities. The law requires that through appropriate entities, the leader of the minority in discussions with the Speaker shall come up with a drug trying system in the house. The law requires that in the resolutions referred to as freedom questions by the Minority or Majority leader shall have priority to all other questions apart from motions to suspend. The rule further prefers minority leader with the role of splitting up of debate time to these resolutions (Aldrich & Rohde, 2000).The law also
ALDRICH, J. H., & ROHDE, D. W. (2000). The consequences of party organization in the
House: The role of the majority and minority parties in conditional party government. In Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era (pp. 31-72).
AMES, B. (2002). Party discipline in the Chamber of Deputies. Legislative Politics in Latin
COX, G. W., & MCCUBBINS, M. D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government
in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.
COX, G. W., & MCCUBBINS, M. D. (2007). Legislative leviathan: Party government in the
House. Cambridge University Press.
DEWHIRST, R. E., & RAUSCH, J. D. (2007). Encyclopedia of the United States Congress.
New York, Facts On File. Page 263.
DICKERSON, M. O., FLANAGAN, T., & ONEILL, B. (2009). An introduction to government
and politics: a conceptual approach. Toronto, Nelson Education. Page 441.
FIGUEIREDO, A. C., & LIMONGI, F. (2000). Presidential power, legislative organization, and
party behavior in Brazil. Comparative Politics, 151-170.
GEER, J. G., SCHILLER, W. J., & SEGAL, J. A. (2014). Gateways to democracy: an
introduction to American government. Boston, MA, Wadsworth/Cengage Learning. Page 415.
GRIER, K. B., & MUNGER, M. C. (1993). Comparing interest group PAC contributions to
House and Senate incumbents, 1980–1986. The Journal of Politics, 55(03), 615-643.
HASECKE, E. B., & MYCOFF, J. D. (2007). Party Loyalty and Legislative Success Are Loyal
Majority Party Members More Successful in the US House of Representatives?. Political Research Quarterly, 60(4), 607-617.
HERRNSON, P. S. (2009). The roles of party organizations, party-connected committees, and
party allies in elections. The Journal of Politics, 71(04), 1207-1224.
JONES, M. P., SAIEGH, S., SPILLER, P. T., & TOMMASI, M. (2002). Amateur Legislators—
Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party-Centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System. American Journal of Political Science, 656-669.
JONES, M. P. (2005, February). The role of parties and party systems in the policymaking
process.In Inter-American Development Bank Workshop on State Reform, Public
Policies and Processes, Washington, DC.
LIPPERT, B. (ED.). (2001). Britain, Germany, and EU enlargement: partners or competitors?.
MCALLISTER, I. (2007). The personalization of politics. The Oxford handbook of political
MOURITZEN, P. E., & SVARA, J. H. (2002). Leadership at the Apex: Politicians and
administrators in Western local governments. University of Pittsburgh Pre.
MÜLLER, W. C. (2000). Political parties in parliamentary democracies: Making delegation and
accountability work. European journal of political research, 37(3), 309-333.
MILLER, S. M., & OVERBY, L. (2010). Parties, preferences, and petitions: Discharge behavior
in the modern house. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 187-209.
ROHDE, D. W. (2010). Parties and leaders in the postreform House. University of Chicago
SMITH, S. S. (2007). Party influence in congress. Cambridge University Press. Page 17.
THERIAULT, S. M. (2006). Party Polarization in the US Congress Member Replacement and
Member Adaptation. Party Politics, 12(4), 483-503.
WILLIAMS, A. (1998). UK government & politics. Oxford, Heinemann. Page 94
VAN BIEZEN, I. (2005). On the theory and practice of party formation and adaptation in new
democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 44(1), 147-174.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples