The violent nonstate actors may compete with the states which are the sovereign powers (Devore & Stähli, 2014). Most political scientists believe that monopoly is enjoyed by the state or the administration that is in power. However, it has become difficult to identify the authority that makes a genuine claim in instances of revolution or civil war Evans & Jones, 2008). The fact is supported by the war in Syria and the experience in Libya when the dictator Muhammad Gadafi was forcefully evicted out of power and killed by the violent nonstate actors.In some instances, powerful governments in the world have strongly come out and supported some of the actions of the NVSAs (Kappen, 2011). The United States for instance supported their actions in Syria and was willing to supply the non-violent state actors with guns and other weapons in order to fight the government. The most government that is in power uses extensive forces against the insurgency and in the process violates human rights due to death of civilians that are considered collateral damage (Kassof, 2004).The use of chemical weapons against the violent state actors have been known to cause debates among the powerful countries in the world and international bodies such as the united nation. Violation of human rights is a worldwide concern (Kassof, 2004). To What Extent Do Violent Non State Actors Contribute to And /Or Detract From Security In the Contemporary World Politics.
Amoore, L. 2010. Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics Of The War On Terror. Security Dialogue, 215-232.
Anker, E. 2006. Terror Firma: Political Topographies of the War on Terror. Theory & Event.
Baker, C. 2005. Philippine Security in the Age of Terror: National, Regional, and Global Challenges in the Post-9/11 World. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 296-296.
Bartolomei, J., & Casebeer, W. 2004. Modeling violent non-state actors: A summary of concepts and methods. Colorado Springs], Colo.: Institute for Information Technology Applications, United States Air Force Academy.
Clarke, R. 2004. Against all enemies: Inside Americas war on terror. New York: Free Press.
Cornish, P. 2011. Terror And Democratic Governance. The Review of Politics, 166-166.
Devore, M., & Stähli, A. 2014. Explaining Hezbollahs Effectiveness: Internal and External Determinants of the Rise of Violent Non-State Actors. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1-27.
Dutka, D. 2006. Violent non-state actors in world politicsh[electronic resource]: Their formation, actions, and effects.
Evans, T., & Jones, D. 2008. Code of Peace: Ethics and Security in the World of Warlord States. International Affairs Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-, 140-140.
Kappen, T. 2011. Governance without a state?: Policies and politics in areas of limited statehood. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kassof, A. 2004. The Administered Society: Totalitarianism Without Terror. World Politics, 558-575.
Kaye, D. 2008. More freedom, less terror? liberalization and political violence in the Arab world. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Khan, N., & Siddiqui, R. 2014. War on terror cells: Killing the host that harbours ‘superbugs’ is an infection control strategy in our fight against infectious diseases. Pathogens and Global Health, 2047773213Y.000-2047773213Y.000.
Mayer, J. 2008. The dark side: The inside story of how the war on terror turned into a war on American ideals. New York: Doubleday.
Mickler, D. 2010. Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics, and the War on Terror. Global Responsibility to Protect, 331-333.
Mulaj, K. 2010. Violent non-state actors in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Reed, J., & Raschke, D. 2010. The ETIM Chinas Islamic militants and the global terrorist threat. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.
Rich, P. 2010. Warlords, state fragmentation and the dilemma of humanitarian intervention. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 78-96.
Smith, J., & Long, J. 2008. Strategic culture and violent non-state actors weapons of mass destruction and asymmetrical operations concepts and cases. USAF Academy, Colo.: USAF Institute for National Security Studies.
Talbott, S. 2001. The age of terror: America and the world after September 11. New York: Basic Books ;.
Zartman, I. 2009. Warlord Politics and African States. Political Science Quarterly, 346-347.
Zuhur, S. 2007. Egypt: Security, political, and Islamist challenges. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples