This is because it eliminated the five-axis system, which required clinicians to diagnose patients using criteria rather than assessing their core psychological disorder. It is essential to emphasize that experts did not clearly define the meaning of the word, axis. In this categorization, personality disorders were grouped together with mental retardation problems. Besides, a group disorders that emanated in childhood could occur together in spite of the unique symptoms (Nussbaum, 2013). Comprehensive grouping recognizes the essence of using terminologies in promoting ethics and the right understanding of certain psychological disorders (Kraemer, 2007). For instance, the new categorization has replaced the term, mental retardation, with the term intellectual disability (Paris & Phillips, 2013). The previous terminology is a demeaning term that manifests particular people as undeserving of human status. On the other hand, the new terminology shows mental problems as situations that are manageable (Eriksen & Kress, 2005). In addition, the obsessive-compulsive disorder classifies on its own instead of its former grouping with anxiety disorders. It is crucial to note that anxiety is a huge factor in the obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinicians, however, desire a coding system that places emphasis on classifying disorders according to their exceptionally unique characteristics. In this sense, obsessive-compulsive disorder cannot be grouped together with anxiety disorders in spite of the strong link. When clinicians follow the DSM categories carefully, they possess the capability of arriving at unbiased diagnosis (Regier, 2011). Currently, the DSM classification system remains the ultimate way of categorizing abnormalities in spite of the claim that it, sometimes, confuses personality weaknesses for disorders.It is crucial to highlight that the DSM-5 is subject to continuous changes based on contemporary research. In this sense, possible changes that have not been open to discovery may be responsible for false diagnosis. In the history of the DSM classification system, disease segments that were known as disorders had been scrapped due to evolving research. In this view, patients who had experienced a particular diagnosis are ruled out as sane. On the other hand, psychiatrists uncover new mental disorders that they include in the DSM classification. This suggests that individuals who are
ReferencesRegier, D. A. (2011). The conceptual evolution of DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples