As a result, data concerning drone-related casualties varies significantly (Enemark 28). Determining how many people were genuine targets under the rules of engagement. Conflicting and suppressed reports and statistics are often released in order to save face, while contradicting information is disputed and discredited. In comparison to actual ground operations, drone strikes are difficult to assess and report on. For instance, since the 2001 invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, casualty reports and statistics have been quite accurate because people on the ground can attest to and easily document occurrences. Drone strikes have proven to be a very convenient way for the government to avoid accountability and openness when it comes to deaths and damages. In this age, we cannot afford to have incidences in which civilians lose their lives just for the sake and nobody can account for such actions. It is wrong and should be brought to a halt.A 2013 report by a U. human rights investigator, Ben Emmerson, estimated that in Pakistan alone, 2,200 people have been died in drone strikes over the past decade. Of the 2,200, at least 400 were innocent civilians and 200 others were “likely noncombatants.” The data was provided by Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry. It was however clear that in virtually all incidents, it was impossible to verify whether the targeted individuals had met the President’s threshold of being imminent threats to America, because government officials have always kept that information secret (Sanger 59). All in all, some level of accountability should be sought and obtained from all. US Governments use of Drones.
Enemark, Christian. Armed Drones and the Ethics of War Military virtue in a post-heroic age.
Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2013. Print.
Sanger, David E. Confront and conceal: Obamas secret wars and surprising use of American
power. New York: Crown Publishers, 2012. Print.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples