In that case, there might be as much as fifty interpretations of the same law. In the absence of federal courts to standardize the federal laws across states, each state would have a different stance for any given issue, similar to how they do for the death penalty (Bohm, 1987). For complex matters, such as monetary policy and the military, this would lead to massive confusion and would undoubtedly hinder the smooth functioning of the nation. In addition, the federal government would lose means to carry out many of its objectives (Carp et. al., 2004). For example, the US federal government’s current War against Terrorism and War on Drugs are issues that need to be dealt with on a national level. In the absence of the federal courts, the federal government would have to rely on the state governments to help accomplish its goals. This would not only be a tedious process but the effectiveness and level of support would differ from state to state. Thus, the existence of a federal system of courts helps ensure that all the states adhere to the federal government’s plan equally and effectively. Moreover, it helps ensure a certain level of uniformity in legal procedures across states. US Criminal Justice System.
Bohm, R. M. (1987) “American Death Penalty Attitudes.” Criminal Justice and Behavior. Volume 14, pp. 380-396.
Carp, R., Stidham, R. & Manning, K. (2004). Judicial Process in America, 6e. Washington DC: CQ Press.
Hart, H. M. (1954) “The Relations between State and Federal Law.” Columbia Law Review. Volume 54, pp. 489-542.
Tarr, A. (1998). Understanding State Constitutions. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples