Kenner & Pearlstein (2012) note that the growth of such companies as, say, Tyson, is disadvantageous to the consumer and competitors. The expansion of trade to a global level is also discouraging the sovereignty of nation-states, and reducing the level of control over the quality of food products produced, putting the health of consumers at risk.
The role of the World Trade Organization is to expand trade throughout the world, with a move towards globalization. However, globalization has its fair share of criticism; the most outstanding one of which is that less powerful nations have less of a say in the direction such debates take. It appears to the poorer nations that their more powerful counterparts make decisions that have an impact on the course of their lives on their behalf, pushing them to the sidelines. However, the WTO has countered this allegation. Legrain (2004) supports the WTO efforts, bashing the claim that developed countries’ opinions matter less. He refers to Ecuador’s example on bananas, in which the EU had turned down their exports and imposed a host of restrictions that made trade difficult due to the increased cost of export. However, the author fails to mention the fact that exports from developed countries far outdo those from developing ones. The World Trade Organization Controversy.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples