According to Owens, “although it involves commendable sustainable housing projects, it does not include plans to upgrade the region’s infrastructure, water supplies, and transport systems” (Costanza, 257). Consequently, the existing infrastructure, water supplies and transport systems are strained by the new housing. Therefore, there is very little difference between this housing scheme and the ones carried out in the past.For many years now, anti-road building lobbies have been arguing that governments should cease building new roads because this will just encourage more people to travel by car, resulting in increased harmful exhaust gas emission. “Governments are taking advantage of this lobbying to cut back on spending on roads leading to deterioration of the road network” (Bleischwitz, 29). Critics are also arguing that the same logic is not applied by the government to new housing because it results in the generation of new taxes. The government simply overlooks the fact that increased housing units lead to increased road traffic in the localities concerned. These practices are understandable since many authorities, institutions, and even individuals tend to focus on reducing costs while simultaneously maximizing benefits. Unfortunately, this is often undertaken at the expense of maximizing positive impact on the environment, and often leads to environmental degradation, and wastage of natural resources.Opponents of sustainable living and sustainable construction indeed have strong arguments against the suitability of this practice for conservation of the environment. However, they overlook many crucial factors regarding this issue which make their arguments irrelevant. First of all, sustainable living and construction can only achieve their aims when they are fully adopted and implemented. Partial adoption and implementation does not meet the aims of sustainability since there is still wastage and contamination of the environment. A sustainable home is built through sustainable methods using sustainable materials that facilitate green practices. However, for such a home to be truly sustainable, it has to be in proximity to sustainable infrastructure such as public transportation services and essential services such as schools and grocery stores. A much more sustainable practice is to construct off-the-grid sustainable
Bleischwitz, Raimund. ‘Governance of sustainable development: co-evolution of corporate and political strategies’, International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 7, No. 1, (2004) pp.27–43.
Bougsty, Tom. Healthy sustainable living: a vision for the future of humanity. Bloomington: iUniverse, 2012.
Costanza, Robert et al. ‘The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital’, Nature, Vol. 387 (1997). pp.253–260.
Halliday, Sandy. Sustainable construction. Burlington: Elsevier Ltd., 2008.
Mirathraratne, Nalanie et al. Sustainable living: the role of whole life costs and values. Burlington: Elsevier Ltd., 2007.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples