Because of this, the jury cannot be considered as highly capable to mete out justice and think fairly and impartially. In fact, this is also the reason why lawyers do a background check and use this information to pick out the jurors that they think are more sympathetic to their side. Thus, even from the start, the trial is already staged with persuasion tactics. Another example of these types of tactics is “stealing the thunder,” wherein the worst that can be said about the lawyer’s client is said at the start and this decreases the impact it would have had if the opposite side was the one to declare it. Kipling Williams (2005) explains that “persuasion is a part of the judicial process from start to finish, from how the judge, as a person of authority, talks to jurors to voir dire – how attorneys select jurors,” and this is questionable as again, the jurors are made to see and believe what the lawyers want them to. It is like they are being manipulated to vote for “guilty” or “not guilty.With these problems in the judicial system of the United States, I believe that changes are in order. If I have the power to enact changes, I would make the jurors more capable of doing the serious job of meting out justice by giving seminars and lectures (at least 3 days before the trial starts) about what is involved with being a juror and a foreman. I would also employ a policy wherein all eyewitnesses should be examined by a court-appointed or in-house psychologist to check whether their memory of what happened is clear—whether they are lying or if there are gaps in their memory. This will increase the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. A secure attachment relationship is formed between an infant and his or her primary caregiver, whether mother, father or relative, when enough attention, love and care is being given. Mothers who form a secure attachment relationship with their babies are known to be sensitive to their needs and have genuine love and concern for them. Insecure attachment relationship is developed when the mothers and/or primary caregiver do not consistently address the needs of the baby. When the mother rejects the infant, he or she can feel it and will grow up to have an avoidant attitude towards relationships. On the other hand, when a mother’s attention is inconsistent and sometimes even contradictory, the child will be so confused that he or she will end up having an ambivalent behavior
Duke, S. B., Lee, A. S. and Pager, C. K. W. (2007). A Pictures Worth a Thousand Words:
Conversational versus Eyewitness Testimony in Criminal Convictions. American Criminal Law Review, 44(1).
Fulwider, J. (2005). Do Moderators Matter? Answering a Jury Deliberation Challenge to
Deliberative Democracy. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Public Policy Center.
Wells, G.L. and Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness Testimony. Annual Review of Psychology,
Williams, K. (2005). Prof explains courtroom persuasion strategies, trial tactics.
Purdue University. Retrieved August 19, 2007 from
Willing, R. (2007). DNA to clear 200th person. USA Today. Retrieved August 19, 2007 from
Yuille, J. C. and Daylen, J. (1998). The Impacts of Traumatic Events on Eyewitness Testimony.
In Payne, D.G. (Ed). Eyewitness Memory: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives (pp. 155-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples