By thinking independently of a God with rules and human values and mores, one can form one’s own concept of responsibility within the framework of culture and community. To realize one’s own potential sans giving credit to or drawing power from a supreme being indicates the ultimate freedom. Unfortunately, the mainstream mind is afraid of this type of freedom, which is why Sartre and his contemporaries suffered much protest and criticism in a time period when communism was gaining ground and the religious and political circles were widening their grasps in the world. This style of philosophy suggests that man gives everything meaning, including himself. The human mind is capable of great imagination and creativity, and in possessing such qualities it is capable of fooling itself into believing in something else being in control. To be free of the constraints of the dogma of any kind is the ultimate freedom, yet what does one do with that freedom? Does it create a sense of well-being or anarchy? Based on recent history, the answer would be both. It is imperative, then, that the individual handles freedom responsibly; God or no God, there are still the consequences of actions and choices. The Pros and Cons of Sartres Theory of Morality Excluding God.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples