The participants should be allowed to go through all the pertinent issues and ask questions related to the research and its benefits. Participants should always be given the chance to write consent and understand the benefits he/she will reap from the participation in the research study. Again the participants should always be taken through the requirements of the research study. Consent should be written in a language that is well understood and which is easy to read and comprehend.Following the victim parents discussions with Dr Andrew Collingwood, it is assumed that he (Dr Andrew Collingwood) will be conducting the research and not a third party. However, due to financial constraints, Dr Andrew Collingwood decides to use a research assistant (Ms Dawn Phillips) to conduct the research. This is un-ethical as it means that the consent obtained by Dr Andrew Collingwood is no longer valid as it was an agreement between the parents and Dr Andrew Collingwood. According to tenets of research ethics, if any thing new should be introduced in a research study, in this case Ms Dawn Phillips, the superiors, in this case Organization Support for Murder Victims should be informed. This is not the case in this scenario since Dr Andrew Collingwood decides alone to include Ms Dawn Phillips without consulting the Organization Support for Murder Victims.Further, for the validity and reliability of the research findings, biasness of the sample should be avoided as much as possible. The selection of the sample should be unbiased and if possible stratified sampling should be used since the targeted population is. Research Ethics.
Callahan, T.C (1998). Research Ethics: Ethics in Medicine. [Online] Available from: http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/resrch.html
Family Health International. [Online] Available from: http://www.fhi.org/
Bryman, A (1992). Quantity and quality in social research 2nd ed.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples