The same also extends to the gender roles where the males domineer or pose an overbearing approach to the lives of women. This happens since the men in most cases seek to define and control what ought to constitute the gender performance and role of the women (Lerner, 2005).2 For instance the men may seek to define the roles or women relative to domestic and office duties. This is where the men may seek to dominate or use their conventional masculine ability to control and impose their wishes and roles on women.Iris claims that the people who have the power are the ones that oppress other people. Young’s definition of the term oppression reveals that the people in power keep down and oppress the majority who are powerless (Young, 1997, p.3 Notably, the people who have the power gain it through ascribed status (Lerner, 1998).4 I concur with Youngs argument that just those with power are the ones who can mistreat. Without power, individuals cant make class frameworks, figure out who can work, have the ability to advise individuals what to do, make others acknowledge their way of life or be permitted to commit violence. These are all attributes that the overwhelming gathering in power has. Learner’s argument in the creation of patriarchy concurs with Young’s arguments on oppression. Gerda claims that women in the Neolithic period were forced to produce more children so that there would be enough labor for farming. Men in the Neolithic period during that commoditized women’s production capacity which is a form of oppression.During the Neolithic period, men had power hence oppressing the women. Additionally, during warfare, there were captives’ involved and included men, women and children. So as to exercise power over the captives, men justified their control by the most seeming difference, often sex (Lerner, 2004).5 The captives were treated depending on the sex. Men were workers while the women provided sexual pleasures and reproduction.According to Iris Young, there are various types of injustices that are present in the society such as exploitation and cultural imperialism. He argues that exploitation does not only refer to the distribution but also to institutional conditions that necessitate individual development and communication. (Young, 2009, p.The ideas of Young concerning exploitation and cultural imperialism are similar to those of Gerda in principle. Gerda
Lerner, G. (1993). The creation of feminist consciousness: From the middle-ages to eighteen-seventy (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.
Lerner, G. (2005). The majority finds its past: Placing women in history. UNC Press Books.
Lerner, G. (1998). Why history matters: Life and thought. Oxford University Press.
Lerner, G. (2004). The Grimke sisters from South Carolina: Pioneers for Womens rights and abolition. Univ of North Carolina Press.
Lerner, G. (1964). Early community work of Black club women. Journal of Negro History, 158-167.
Young, I. R., Hajnal, J. V., Roberts, I. G., Ling, J. X., Hill‐Cottingham, R. J., Oatridge, A., & Wilson, J. A. (1996). An evaluation of the effects of susceptibility changes on the water chemical shift method of temperature measurement in human peripheral muscle. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 36(3), 366-374.12
Young, I. M. (2011). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.
Young, I. M. (2009). Five faces of oppression. Geographic Thought. A Praxis Perspective.
Young, I. M. (1989). Polity and group difference: a critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, 250-274.
Young, I. M. (1997). Unruly categories: a critique of Nancy Fraser’s dual systems theory. New Left Review, 147-160.
Young, I. M. (1986). The ideal of community and the politics of difference. Social theory and practice, 1-26.
Young, I. M. (1985). Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. Praxis International, (4), 381-401.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples