In that case, specialists propose cochlear implants to be done on very young children once it is determined that they have the cochlear related hearing loss.The University of Maryland Medical Center confirmed this through several tests. They found out that children who get cochlear implants below the age of two years gained good speech skills and could even attend mainstream schools. The skills were much better compared to children between two and five years (University of Maryland Medical 3). University of Maryland Medical center researchers concluded that the auditory nerves will get used to the stimulations by the implant leading to an improvement in the normal cochlear function. Cochlear implants at such young age can help the children integrate into mainstream society (Sarant, 21).
Living a normal life is the dream of deaf people. Cochlear implants have availed invaluable normal life experience. The deaf is able to make phone calls, watch television, go to seminars, attend classes and interact well with other people. They do not have to keep struggling to read the lips of the people they talk to. Normal life for the deaf dramatically improves their self-confidence, self-esteem and a sense of self-worth. They are able to perform better in their school work. Punch and Adye confirmed that cochlear implants improved the psychological and social-emotional being of children after a study in Australia (479). Discrimination towards the deaf reduced dramatically. Normal hearing children were encouraged to establish contact with the deaf. These factors assisted the children to improve performance in school according to that study.
It is evident that cochlear implants hold the future of the hearing problems. Further advancement in technology and research on hearing loss will improve cochlear implants remarkably. Many researchers around the world are researching on the different aspects of hearing loss, which will allow the solutions to be worked on from different viewpoints.
Gantz, Bruce et al. Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing. The Laryngoscope 115.5 (2005) 796-802. Print.
Hearing Loss Foundation. 2013 Researchers and projects. 2013. Web. 27 November 2013.
Heyning, Paul and Punte, Jeine. Cochlear Implants and Hearing Preservation. Basel: Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers, 2010. Print.
James, Chris et al. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: How and why? Acta Oto-laryngologica 125.5 (2005): 481-491. Print.
Punch, Renee and Hyde, Merv. Social Participation of Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants: A Qualitative Analysis of Parent, Teacher, and Child Interviews. Journal of daf studies 16.4 (2011): 474-493.
Waltzman, Susan and, Roland, Thomas. Cochlear Implants. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2006. Print.
Wilson, Blake, and Dorman, Michael. “Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future”. Elsevier August 2008: 3-21. Print.
Wise, Nancy. High Fidelity: Cochlear implant users report dramatically better hearing with new Vanderbilt process. Vanderbilt University Medical Center. 5 March 2013. Web. 27 November 2013.
Sarant, Julia. Cochlear Implants in Children; A Review. Rijeka: Intech, 2012. Print.
University of Maryland Research Center. Cochlear Implant. N.d. Web. 27 November 2013.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples