Green belts have been an essential mechanism for planning in England. Within it, it is hard to get permission for planning for development. The purpose of that is to preserve the setting and memorable character of the town, check unrestricted emergence of built-up areas, assist safeguarding the countryside from encroachment and finally to restrain the neighboring towns from merging into another (Wicksteed, 2005). For Cambridge, without the green belt then the city would have spread out to the surrounding villages and reduce their unique character.With the turn of the new century, Cambridge has an alternative view to the future of its developments. There have been tensions among the various elements of policies of planning (Benson & Jordan, 2004). On one hand, the green belt’s aim was to restrict development, while, on the other side, it aims at providing affordable homes in the interest of sustainable development. The planning framework for Cambridge had itself become unsustainable. There has been problems in the structure plan of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough of 2003 (Sage & Halkier, 2005). This is due to not having the infrastructure to give support to the growing population and economy in the sub region of Cambridge. Consequently, this has resulted into recruitment hardship and skill shortages. The public infrastructure has also improved under this plan however, it is still not enough to satisfy the present needs and still has fallen short of the requirements of the future. As a consequence of this, the sub region of Cambridge is experiencing escalating hardships, which affect its ability to prosper and grow into a leading centre for research and development (Morrison, 2010).To curb these issues, a more balanced strategy for planning was established. The agreement was that the green belt was to be preserved and the land was to be let, to allow further development on the edge of the city (Benson & Jordan, 2004). To complement this, Northstowe, a new settlement is to be built beyond the green belt linking Cambridge and other villages, by a means of a bus way.One distinct feature of the city is narrow boundaries drawn by the Municipal. The emphasis is on developing the periphery of the city, which should involve joint work with the rural district of South Cambridgeshire District, which surrounds the administrative area of the City (Sagan & Halkier, 2005). The
Benson, D, & Jordan, A 2004, Sustainability Appraisal in Local Land-Use Planning: Patterns of Current Performance, Journal Of Environmental Planning And Management, 47, 2, pp. 269-286, EconLit with Full Text, EBSCOhost, viewed 16 February 2012.
Morrison, N 2010, A Green Belt under Pressure: The Case of Cambridge, England, Planning Practice & Research, 25, 2, pp. 157-181, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 16 February 2012.
Sagan, I., & Halkier, H, 2005 ‘Regionalism contested: institution, society and governance’. Aldershot, Ashgate.
Waters, R, & Smith, H, 2002, Regional Development Agencies and Local Economic Development: Scale and Competitiveness in High-technology Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire, European Planning Studies, 10, 5, pp. 633-649, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 16 February 2012.
Wicksteed, William (2005). Cambridge: The Cambridge Phenomenon ISOCARP Review: Making Spaces for the Creative Economy. Aldershot, Ashgate.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples