The perception of leaders’ decision-making has changed globally, (Ashkenas 1995). It is clear that effective companies characteristically find their benefit in allowing full participation in making of decisions and empowering required individuals irrespective of the organizational level to contribute to the decision-making quality.In addition, the organizational culture aspect is at the center of comprehending the environmental condition including a making of the decision, (Aldrich, 2009). Organizational culture entails the values that emerge in a team, the main norms emphasized by the institution, the philosophy that directs the team, organizational policies and workforce operations and behavior.As the organizational culture, affect the perception of leaders’ decisions, the leaders’ decisions similarly affect the company and shaping of the organizational structure. Therefore, the institution alters its mechanism; the main desire encompasses the evaluation of the compatibility of the choices perceptions with the culture of the institution, (Bass, 2005). The perception or option stands for the inherent course of action for leaders making the choices.Organizational leaders are entrusted with the organizational workforce, facilities, property, and reputation that they should operate with the ad through to attain the goals and purpose of the organization. They are also crucial in making organization’s decisions and implementing them for benefit of the organization. In various organizations, the perception of decision-making process and decisions by leaders determine and influence the climate and the efficiency of the healthy working condition.Experts define it as the way people interpret their experiences. The ability to acquire and maintain the right perception is a crucial skill that any effective manager’s decision-making requires. Similarly, experts agree that one’s perception is demonstrated through communication in both small and large companies and organizations.
Aldrich, H. E. (2009). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ashkenas, R. N. (1995). The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bass, B. M. (2005). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press
Burton, R. M., Obel, B., & DeSanctis, G. (2011). Organizational design: A step-by-step approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cavanaugh, J. (2007). Organizational structure. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University.
Dyer, W. G. (1995). Team building: Current issues and new alternatives. Reading, Mass: Addison- Wesley.
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lord, R. G., Klimoski, R. J., & Kanfer, R. (2002). Emotions in the workplace: Understanding the structure and role of emotions in organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McFarland, L. J., Senen, S., & Childress, J. R. (1993). Twenty-first-century leadership. New York: Leadership Press.
Misumi, J. (2005). The behavioral science of leadership: An interdisciplinary Japanese research program. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Osland, J., Kolb, D. A., & Rubin, I. M. (2001). Organizational behavior: An experiential approach. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Rant, M. (2004). Role of organizational structure and organizational learning process. (Program & proceedings, 14-18.)
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples