Taking into consideration the above scenario whether organizational factor or individual professional ability is responsible for a successful partnership, the current study aims to determine the dominance of the factor mentioned above along with the factors that serve to be a deterrent or incitement in promoting partnership working. It is highly important for an organization to follow management practices and make use of the limited constraint resources in order to accomplish the organizational partnership goals and harmonize the ultimate objective of partnership. Thus, the study would also aim to identify the focal points of partnership that can be of immense help in application specifically related to medical and health sciences. Various professional codes and organizational structures have deep influence on partnerships, their essence, relevance and influence would be adjudged. Setting up and maintaining successful partnership requires establishment of partnership norms that need to be structured and proper plans to be formulated. It is important to highlight the real philosophy and policy of partnerships as referred in the post modern world (Carter 1988), specifically related to social health and welfare. Past researches reveal the fact that considering clients at the focal point of good health and social care, partnerships becomes quintessential. The study would explore the issues that actually create an urge to build partnership workings for resolving complex client problems.Looking upon the recent trends in the health and social care arena, the emergence of business partnerships is peculiar and strongly influenced by the organizational policy and factors which further are prone to changes due to the dynamic nature of the same. It is seen that partnership working in health care is beneficial as segregation of social factor can be better managed with the help of multidisciplinary action, moreover redundancy of services rendered by various organizations can be curbed (Peckham & Exworthy 2003).. Medical care is benefited through a collaborative effort that leads to minimal dilution of tasks and activities performed by various agencies and organizations (Huxham & MacDonald (1992). An added advantage that medical and health care attains is that the frequency of agencies resulting in counterproductive services is also mitigated. But at the same time, partnership working does have its own unconstructive consequences as
Brown, B., Crawford, P., & Darongkamas, J. 2000. Blurred roles and permeable boundaries: the experience of multidisciplinary working in community mental health, Health and Social Care in the Community, Nov 8(6): 425–35.
Carnwell. R., and Carson. A., 1998. Understanding Partnerships and Collaborations. Available at http://www.mcgraw-hill.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335214371.pdf. [Accessed on 13th Nov, 2011].
Compassion Capital Fund National Resource Center. 2008. Strengthening Non-Profits: A Capacity Builder’s Resource Library. Partnerships: Frameworks for Working Together. Available at http://strengtheningnonprofits.org/resources/guidebooks/Partnerships.pdf. [Accessed on 13th Nov, 2011].
Carter, J. 1998. Postmodernity and the Fragmentation of Welfare. Routledge, London.
Courtney, R., Ballard, E., Fauver, S., Gariota, M. & Holland, L. (1996) The partnership model: working with individuals, families and communities towards a new vision of health, Public Health, 13: 177–86.
DoH (1997) The New NHS Modern Dependable: A National Framework for Assessing Performance. The Stationery Office, London.
DoH (1999a) Modernising Health and Social Services: Developing the Workforce. The Stationery
DH (Department of Health) (2000a) Assessing children in need and their families:
Practice guidance, London: The Stationery Office.
DfES (Department for Education and Skills), DWP (Department for Work and
Pensions), HM Treasury and Women and Equality Unit (2002) Inter-departmental
childcare review: Delivering for children and families, London: Office of the Deputy
DH (Department of Health), DfEE (Department for Education and Employment)
and Home Office (2000) Framework for the assessment of children in need and their
families, London: The Stationery Office.
Gallant, M.H., Beaulieu, M.C. & Carnevale, F.A. 2002. Partnership: an analysis of the concept within the nurse–client relationship, Journal of Advanced Nursing 40(2): 149–57.
Peckham, S. & Exworthy .2003. Primary Care in the UK: Policy, Organisation and Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Huxham, C & MacDonald, D. 1992. Introducing collaborative advantage, Management Decision, 30(3): 50–6.
Rodgers, B.L. 2000. Concept analysis: an evolutionary view in B. L. Rodgers and K. A. Knafl (eds) Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques and Applications (2nd edn). Saunders, Philadelphia
Secker, J. & Hill, K. 2001. Broadening the partnerships: experiences of working across community agencies, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Nov., 15(4): 341–50.
Lyotard, J. F. 1992 The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Waine.B., Tunstill.J., and Meadows.P., 2005. Developing social care: values and principles. Available at http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/positionpapers/pp04/values.pdf. [Accessed on 13th Nov, 2011].
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples