Approximately, eighty-eight percent of the land was controlled by two percent of the population. Most of the cultivable land was not utilized properly. Therefore, under the reform, a lot of the land was equitably redistributed among the population.
On the other hand, if we draw comparisons to the Bolivian revolution, it could be observed that the realities were very different (Handy, 1984). While in Guatemala, the revolution was the offshoot of the popular thought, in Bolivia, it was the result of the impoverished conditions that led to the revolution. The principal incendiaries of the revolution here were denied power a number of times (Thomas, 1987). It was inoperative that they would resort to the use of power. Secondly, the economic situations prevailing in the country were extremely poor with the farm prices falling, reduced growth rates and high amount of poverty. The equitable distribution of wealth was the last reason. Therefore, the fundamental premise at which these two movements were formulated is fundamentally different. Nature and the Primary Difference between the Guatemalan Reforms and the Bolivian Revolution.
Arnade, C. W. (1970). The Emergence of the Republic of Bolivia. Gainsville: University of Florida Press.
Handy, J. (1984). Gift of the Devil: A History of Guatemala. Boston: South End Press.
Kolata, A. L. (1993). The Tiwankau: Portrait of an Andean Civilization. NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Thomas, V.B. (1987). The Political Economy of Central America since 1920. NY: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples