Our focus will be on the first type of government and the strategies formulated by such a government in establishing the civil-military relations on good grounds. This practice is seen in most of the leading countries in the world like China. The leaders of the nation often give high weight to the civil management of the armed forces. It is a well known fact that the guns are meant for firing only. You need a cool head to aim them though. Civil governments play their effective role in guiding the path for the armed forces.One of the main reasons why civilians can be better at management as governing bodies than the army persons is that generally civilians come from the back ground of more education and hence more strategic planning in peaceful environment kept by the army. High standards of education are not observed in army where the purpose is to keep the discipline and to defend the integrity of the nation.The need of civil government must be taken into consideration that rules over all the affairs of the country of which military group comprise a vital part. It has been ascertained that the civil government is necessary for the deep insight of all the issues since military thinking approach is a bit rigid at times. The thinking process by the civilians and the armed troops is quite different. Sometimes emotions have to be curtailed for achieving something bigger in the picture. Civil management is quite necessary for the stable and liberal democracy. It controls all the affairs will great sense of artistry and management skills that are rarely possessed by the military personnel.There are some drawbacks associated with the civil management of the defense since civilians are not aware of the passion and skills possessed by the army. So leading the army could be quite hectic for civilians sometimes. It is difficult to establish relations with military personnel on good grounds. Experience of working with them could be very useful that could provide some kind of information about the psyche of the military groups. These groups have their own way of thinking that needs to be deeply analyzed by civilians for controlling them properly.The role of civil government is very important in the time of crisis like war. It is very important to establish good management in all the groups including army to maintain the economical and social stability of the country. In such critical situations, it would be unwise to rely on Army men since
Booth, B. a. (2001). Are Post-Cold War Militaries Postmodern? Armed Forces & Society, 319--342.
Cohen, E. A. (2012). Supreme Command: soldiers, statesmen and leadership in wartime. SimonandSchuster. com.
Cottey, A. a. (2002). Democratic Control of the Military in Postcommunist Europe: Guarding the Guards. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dandeker, C. a. (1996). Gender integration in armed forces: Recent policy developments in the United Kingdom. Armed Forces & Society, 29--47.
Feaver, P. (2005). Armed servants: Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.
Janowitz, M. (1960). The Professional Soldier (Glencoe, IL). Free Press.
Kaldor, M. (2012). New and old wars. Polity.
McMaster, H. R. (2011). Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff. HarperCollins.
Moskos, C. C. (2000). The postmodern military: Armed forces after the Cold War. Oxford University Press Oxford.
Summers, H. G. (1995). On strategy: A critical analysis of the Vietnam War. Random House Digital, Inc.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples