Patients who are prescribed a bone scan, are usually suspected to have abnormal cellular activity taking place which in many cases, can be cancerous. Clearly locating abnormal growths and efficiently diagnosis such growths is time sensitive and even emergent in some cases. Physicians in conjunction with medical technicians operating diagnostic machinery, must be able to rely heavily on their fractional margin of error and reliability in yielding accurate and sensitive results.In order to conduct a study that would allow for an accurate assessment of whether or not CT contrast effects the outcome of bone scans or not, a sample group must be established. The sample group would need to be relatively small however in light of keeping costs down due to the administration of numerous, expensive diagnostic tests to each person within the sample. It would also be necessary to make sure that the sample group was within a similar age range and health status. For example, if the group was limited to individuals who were between the ages of 30 and 34, with no history of tumors, benign or malignant and no history of bone disease, the results should remain relatively accurate.Once the sample group has been established, the first of three tests could be conducted. The first test administered would be a bone scan. One week later, the second test could be administered for each individual, which would be a CT scan with contrast dye. One week later, the third test in two parts could be administered but would need to be conducted all within the same day. This would include a CT test with contrast dye followed by a bone scan. Once these series of tests were conducted on all 50 participants, the results could be examined and interpreted. The focus of the data interpretation being on the image obtained from the first bone scan in comparison with the second image obtained from the second bone scan which was given on the day of the CT scan with contrast dye administration.This preliminary set of results will most likely serve to establish a trend in whether or not there is a distinct difference between bone scans where CT contrast has been used and then a bone scan conducted on the same individual where no CT contrast was used that same day. As it is expected to see a trend in clarity in imaging when there is an absence of CT contrast, it may be necessary to repeat the same set of experimentation on a
Ell M.D, Peter J. “Comments and perspectives. Nuclear medicine in Europe”, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 6 903, 2005.
Imigins, “Information about intravenous and oral contrast used in CT”, retrieved from website at: http://www.imaginis.com/ct-scan/contrast.asp. 2008.
Nissl R.N., Jan, “Bone Scan”, retrieved from website at: http://www.revolutionhealth.com/conditions/breast-cancer/bone-
The Mayo Clinic, “Bone scan: Using nuclear medicine to find bone abnormalities”, retrieved from website at:http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/bone-scan/CA00020. 2008.
Medicine.net, “What is a CT scan”, retrieved from website at: http://www.medicinenet.com/cat_scan/article.htm
NASA, “X-Rays in Nuclear Medicine”, retrieved from website at: http://www.unesco.org/webworld/public_domain/tunis97/com_35/com_35. Html. 2008
NASA, “Gamma rays”, retrieved from website at: http://science.hq.nasa.gov/kids/imagers/ems/gamma.html
Radiology Info, “What is CT scanning of the body”, retrieved from website at: http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=bodyct&bhcp=1
Cluet M.D., Jonathan, “About contrast dye”, retrieved from website at: http://orthopedics.about.com/cs/tumors/g/contrastdye.htm. 2008
Zaidi, Habib, “Current Status and Future Perspectives”, retrieved from website at: http://www.unesco.org/webworld/public_domain/tunis97/com_35/com_35. html. 2008.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples