Likewise, the manufacturers will also have to prove that the MP3 players and the Exit Poll are vastly similar products that share the same market segment. The Exit Poll is an entirely different product than the MP3 player. The former is a product aimed at persons interested in following and predicting election results whereas the latter is primarily for entertainment purposes. It is entirely unlikely that the average consumer would confuse the two products and that as such, Barak and John can pass the Exit Poll off as an MP3 player. To this end, there can be no deception or damages since confusion of the two products is entirely out of the question. U-boat's claim to the brand-name Exit Poll is a particularly difficult hurdle for John and Barak and they might want to use a different name. This is particularly so if U-Vote has a registered trademark. Section 10(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 provides as follows: "...a person infringes a registered trade mark if he uses in the course of trade a sign which is identical with the trademark in relation to goods or services which are identical with those for which it is registered...". The Primary Source of Substantive Law With Respect to Patent Protection Within the UK.
Aswan Engineering Establishment v Lipdine Co  1WLR 1.
Associated Newspapers Ltd v Express Newspapers  EWHC 1322.
Bainbridge, David . (2007) Intellectual Property. Pearson Longman.
Biogen Inc v Medeva plc  RPC 1.
Christopher Hill v Ltd v Ashton Piggeries  AC 441.
Consumer Protection Act 1987.
Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988.
Cornish, W.R.,(2003) Intellectual Property: Patent, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights , London, Sweet & Maxwell.
Council Directive 85/374/EEC.
Drexl, J and Kur, A. (2005) Intellectual Property and private international Law: heading for the future, Oxford: Portland, Or: hart Pub.
European Patent Convention 2000.
Fairgreive, Duncan. (ed) (2005) Product Liability in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition.
Frank Reddaway Ltd. v. George Banham,  A.C. 199.
Intellectual Property Office. (n.d.) Available online at: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/patent.htm Retrieved 2 March, 2009.
Intellectual Property Office. (n.d.) Apply for a Patent. Available online at: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-applying/p-apply.htm Retrieved 2 March, 2009.
Intellectual Property Office. (n.d.) Copyright. http://www.ipo.gov.uk/copy.htm Retrieved 2 March, 2009.
Intellectual Property Office. (n.d.) “Getting Your Patent Granted More Quickly.” Available online at: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-fastgrantguide.pdf Retrieved 2 March, 2009.
Llewelyn, Margaret Dr. “Proposals for the Introduction of a Community Utility Model System: A UK Perspective.”  2 Web JCLI http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/articles2/llewel2.html Retrieved 3 March, 2009.
Patent Protection Act 1977.
Reckitt & Colman Ltd v Borden Inc  1 All E.R. 873.
R Griggs Group Ltd. & Ors v Evans & Ors  EWHC 1914.
Sale of Goods Act 1979.
Telsonic AG’s Patent  RPC, 38.
Trade Marks Act 1994.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples