There is no a single right idea defining the full extent of the local impacts from Marcellus Shale operations. Moreover, there is a need to consider this impact both at national and local levels. Of course, the proponents of gas extraction in Marcellus Shale claim that they act in compliance with environmental regulations and they take steps in order to satisfy the needs of the society and avoid economic destruction in the world. At the same time, their position is often supported by their compliance with environmental concerns.Currently, geologists underline that they have known about the natural gas resources of the Marcellus Shale formation for many years. On the one hand, massive gas exploration was considered to be too costly and complicated process and that is why only contemporaries try to embody this idea. Such technological advancement as specifically horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing enable modern engineers extracting natural gas beneath land.Possible environmental issues and community concerns about their health and many other issues have been raised in the discussion about potential environmental and community impacts caused by the drilling. Modern researches and studies are focused on water use and management concerns as well as the kind of the fluids used in the process of shell fracturing (Hiserodt, 2011).Therefore, it is supposed by the developers of the techniques implemented for hydraulic fracturing that large volumes of water are required for rocks fracturing and large amount of gas producing” (A Rush of Energy in Pennsylvania, 2011). Each well requires more than million gallons of water.It is also needed to add harmful particles to water in order to increase efficiency of water fracturing. In the result of such a harmful activity, negative outcomes as well piping may occur. Moreover, another special concerns of environmentalists is that it is necessary to prevent this negative impact made on well. For example, it is possible to prevent corrosion in pipes and protect the well. In accordance with Department, it is required to work out the best environmentally safe practices to ensure the necessity of safeguards used in the process of fracturing (Halperin 2010, p.Another question remains open: whether New York approved a new type of drilling. A new regulation developed by Governor David A. Paterson (July, 2008) is
1. Halperin, Alex. "Drill, Maybe Drill? Upstate New Yorkers Debate Whether Natural-Gas Drilling Is Their Ticket out of Economic Depression-Or a Serious Environmental Risk." The American Prospect May 2010: 16+. Questia. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.
2. Hiserodt, Ed. "The Coming Shale Gale: Recently Considered to Be Waning, Natural-Gas Production Is Now Booming, Thanks to New Methods of Obtaining Gas from Shale Stone. but Environmentalists Want to End the Drilling." The New American 20 June 2011: 10+. Questia. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.
3. Howells, Polly. "Dont Frack with Our Water!." In These Times Oct. 2009: 24+.Questia. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.
4. Manuel, John. "EPA Tackles Fracking." Environmental Health Perspectives 118.5 (2010): 199. Questia. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.
5. McKay, Lynn Kerr, Ralph H. Johnson, and Laurie Alberts Salita. "Science and the Reasonable Development of Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Resources in Pennsylvania and New York." Energy Law Journal 32.1 (2011): 125+.Questia. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.
6. "A Rush of Energy in Pennsylvania; Marcellus Shale Motherlode of Natural Gas Brings World of Change to Wary Community." The Washington Times (Washington, DC) 23 May 2011: A01. Questia. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.
7. Russell, William L. Structural Geology for Petroleum Geologists. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1955. Questia. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.
8. Zwick, Jesse. "Clean, Cheap, and out of Control: Why Natural Gas Could Be the Fuel of the Future, and How the Industry Could Blow It All Up." Washington Monthly May-June 2011: 34+. Questia. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples