Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists Essay Example

Show related essays

Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists

This is a preview of the 4-page document
Read full text

Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists. The legal status of the newspaper advertisement like the one placed by Arthur on advertising for the sale of a car is that of an invitation to treat. In the English contract law, an invitation to treat refers to the action of individuals placing information at the disposal of other parties, to the effect that the individuals would want to negotiate the terms of the offer of sale of the goods or services for which the newspaper advertisement has been made. In this respect, therefore, a newspaper advertisement placed by an individual stating the sale of a product and the terms of sale therein does not amount to a binding contract, but rather an invitation for the parties interested in the product offered to make an offer.

Therefore, the individual advertising the product is not bound by the law to enter into a contract with the parties that respond to this advertisement offer. This simply means that the advertiser is at liberty to enter into a contract with the individuals who express interest or not, based on the choices of the advertiser. The case of an invitation to treat was demonstrated by the ruling under Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists, in which the court clarified the difference between an invitation to treat and an offer for sale. The courts clarified that the display of products on a shelf or the advertisement of the sale of a product in a newspaper simply amounts to an invitation to treat, which is simply the notification to invite the public to make their offers, without any legal liability on the side of the advertiser or the exhibitioner who has displayed the goods on the shelves. Question 2RodneyThe English contract law provides that the advertiser of goods or products for sale through a newspaper is under duty to scrutinize the offers that have been tendered by the interested parties if such offers are made before the expiry of the deadline that has been set by the advertisement, and without any variation in the offers. Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists.

This is a preview of the 4-page document
Open full text

Bibliography

1. Section 57 (2) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979

2. Pharmaceutical Society v Boots Cash Chemists [1953] EWCA Civ 6

3. Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394

4. Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Law, Culture, Politics
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Law, Psychology, Science
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists
  • Pages: 4 (1000 words)
  • Document Type: Case Study
  • Subject: Law
  • Level: Undergraduate
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us