The mains supply of Philips Practix 360 is 230 volts of power an equivalent of 50 Hertz. The initiation process of the machine requires minimal time of 0.8 seconds and each exposure time should be at least one minute and 2 seconds (Sullivan and Krieger 2004, 164).Exposure of ionization radiation to either the patients or radiologists can have detrimental effects on the well-being of these individuals. It has proven scientifically, that ionization radiation is capable of producing biological effects of mutation. This over exposure marks the beginning of a lifelong problem that can be inherent among the affected individuals’ offsprings. The major problem thus associated with exposure to such radiation is genetic predisposition. It has been postulated that no matter the quantity of radiation, the impact on a person’s health can be severe. Therefore, there is the need and necessity for a safety operation guideline in order to prevent over exposure periods or unwanted radiation exposures. It is also imperative to control the levels of ionization radiation whenever necessary. As such, medical and healthcare institutions must undertake the first step in achieving the objectives set above. These institutions must be in the forefront in the formulation and strict adherence to the safety guidelines and regulatory policies on X-ray imaging and diagnostics.On the basis of International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations, the institutions must support the following principles. First and foremost, there must be a justification for the radiological procedure. This clearly states that no practice associated with exposure to ionization energy must be adopted not unless its outcome is of sufficient benefit to offset the impact of the radiation. The second principle concerns the optimization procedure whereby all radiation exposures must be kept as minimal as possible. Thirdly and lastly, the radiation exposure to patients must be subject to dosage limits. Alternatively, this limitation principle should put into consideration control mechanisms that no person is exposed to unacceptable radiation risks. In cases of therapeutic intervention, the procedure must be lay emphasis on careful and appropriate planning prior to ionizing radiation (Turner, Kloos, and Morton 2002, 117).In this particular X-ray imaging
Abujudeh, Hani H., and Michael A. Bruno. Quality and Safety in Radiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Banta, H. David. Health Care Technology And Its Assessment In Eight Countries. Darby: DIANE Publishing, 2004.
Byers, Jacqueline Fowler, and Susan V. White. Patient safety: principles and practice. Heidelberg: Springer Publishing Company, 2004.
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). Guidelines for Auditing Process Safety Management Systems. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
Krettek, Christian, and Dirk Aschemann. Positioning techniques in surgical applications: thorax, and heart surgery, vascular surgery, visceral and transplantation surgery, urology, surgery of the spinal cord and extremities, arthroscopy, pediatric surgery, navigation/ISO-C 3D. Boston: Birkhäuser, 2006.
Ray, Sidney F. Scientific photography and applied imaging. Massachussetts: Focal Press, 1999.
Smith, Nadine Barrie, and Andrew Webb. Introduction to Medical Imaging: Physics, Engineering and Clinical Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Sullivan, John Burke, and Gary R. Krieger. Clinical environmental health and toxic exposures. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
Turner, Clark, Donald Kloos, and Robert Morton. "Radiation Safety Characteristics of Nomad Portable X-ray System." Aribex Inc., 2002: 112-127.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples