This approach is clearly scientific since a theory or a fact gains acceptance as more and more researchers come to the same conclusion on a hypothesis. Additionally, Khaldun suggests that anyone who is studying history must evaluate the given information on his/her own before accepting tradition as the truth.
As an example, he discusses how monetary figures, military numbers, and other such points can be exaggerated or completely falsified. In the case of estimating military might he suggests that a historian study the figures and see if the numbers are realistically possible given the social setup of a country. Taking a commonsense approach to the study of history is certainly something which can help improve the understanding of a historian.
In these terms, his appreciation for the older works of history becomes lower because he notices how numbers given for the armies of a country do not match up with the size of the nations and how the genealogy of certain figures does not match up with the time passed between the forefathers and the famous figures. Therefore while the student can learn history from ancient texts, they have to be taken with a grain of salt because the certain information within the text may not be as accurate as it would seem.
In short, Khaldun’s ideas about the study of history can be summarized as taking a realistic as well as a scientific approach to the study of history and his opinion about older texts certainly shows this method to work quite well. Common sense and simple analytical analysis can show what the real situation might have been like for the history of the past while the works of previous historians can be taken as general guidelines rather than the absolute truth for the majority of cases where there is a chance of falsification. Ibn Khaldun and the Philosophy of History.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples