Moreover, the PSFS building is idealistic. While most buildings are naturalized, this building is idealized and realistic. When looking at the building, once can see these factors in the style that was used during its design.As per the requirement of the assignment, this building is similar in some manner to the Cesar Pelli. It is appropriate to assess the components of the Cesar Pelli. It is a portrait shaped building located in Kuala Lupar. It is one of the best twin buildings that exist in the area. Cesar Pelli can also be said to have mostly comprised of glasses. This is then bound together with the rest of the building mostly through utilization of steel and concrete. The building contains two similarly shaped towers that act as office places.Both of these buildings are comprised mostly of glass. In addition, these buildings are bound by concrete. Both buildings present different uniqueness areas. While the PSFS appears like it has a separate base and the Western wing, Caeser Pelli building is not a free stander. This implies that the latter building has new and additional features that are becoming common among architects and artists. This is the two-block style of constructing a building. This implies that the latter building is essentially two buildings that are joined by a bridge for people to cross through the two buildings. The times when the two pieces of art were made are also different. For instance, the Cessar Pelli was made in 1998 while the PSFS building was completed in the year 1932. Given the time. History of Modern Art.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples