Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

In the frame of current ACLS best practice and ILOR guidelines; ''Review the evidence supporting carebral resuscitation'' Essay Example

Show related essays

In the frame of current ACLS best practice and ILOR guidelines; ''Review the evidence supporting carebral resuscitation''

This paper shall now discuss CCR and the contrasting views related to its application. It shall discuss the argument that CCR is superior to CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) in terms of survival rates and neurological outcomes. Supporting evidence on both sides of the issue shall be presented, along with more specific data which can be utilized to either support or disprove the general application of this intervention.I believe that CCR is an effective method of resuscitation as it can improve survival rates of arresting patients. A study by Ewy and Kern (2009) is based on a literature review of current studies supporting the application of CCR. The study points out that there are various issues in the use of CPR. Firstly, the bystanders witnessing arresting patients may be willing to notify the EMS; however, they may not be willing to carry out mouth-to-mouth ventilation (Ewy and Ker, 2009). Secondly, stopping the chest compression in order to ventilate the patient can often reduce the patient’s survival rate. Lastly, positive pressure ventilation in the CPR process for arresting patients can increase intrathoracic pressure, reduce venous return to the thorax, as well affect the circulation to the heart and brain (Ewy and Kern, 2009). These elements, when taken as a whole, make CPR a less effective means of managing arresting patients. The results of this study are, however, not significantly reliable because the data is based on secondary research. There are various pitfalls of secondary data, including the unreliability of the data gathered and the lack of control on the initial data gathered by the researchers (Yilmaz, 2009). Moreover, no actual clinical study was carried out by the authors, but their extrapolations were drawn from the primary studies of other researchers. In order to increase reliability of studies research related to cardiovascular research, a randomized controlled trial would have been more appropriate (Stanley, 2007).I support the application of cardiocerebral resuscitation for arresting patients. CCR does not include mouth-to-mouth ventilation, making it a more desirable option for bystanders attending to arresting patients (Bray, Deasy, Walsh, Bacon, Currell, and Smith, 2011). In CCR, the role of positive pressure ventilation by the EMS is reduced, and chest compressions are emphasized in the immediate moments following the arrest

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Health Sciences & Medicine, Medical science, Nursing
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Health Sciences & Medicine, Nursing, Medical science
Hire a Writer
preview essay on In the frame of current ACLS best practice and ILOR guidelines; ''Review the evidence supporting carebral resuscitation''
  • Pages: 10 (2500 words)
  • Document Type: Literature review
  • Subject: Health Sciences & Medicine
  • Level: Undergraduate
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples