In this particular scenario, the conflict in the discussion is whether the medical practices should disregard religious issues that threaten or are harmful to the existence of individuals especially if the principles are protected by the constitution of the US. In reference to the bone of contention referred earlier in this paper, the constitution grants the parents the fundamental rights of providing guidance in the upbringing of children (Hall, 2013). This is inclusive of making choices on the kind of medical care a child is to receive in the event that the child is ailing. In addition, individuals have the rights to exercise their religious beliefs freely according to the First Amendment. This amendment also provides the parents with the rights of caring for their kids within or according to the principles of the religion they subscribe to. It implies that foregoing treatment due to religious convictions has a legal backing (Huguelet & Koenig, 2009). Interestingly, the constitution of the US stipulates that all the citizens have the right to better medical services. Thus using religious connotation and principles to hamper medical treatment leads to a situation where principles are conflicting. In addition, medical practices usually have the backing of evidence of ability to improve the conditions of an ailing person if appropriately diagnosed (Bellamy, 2014). Foregoing curative treatment has the potential danger of risking the life of the ailing individual especially those who may be in severe pain. In such a scenario, the motives of the individual advocating for religious healing can be questioned. As much as the principles of practicing principles of religion especially in providing care for children have a constitutional baking, these rights have limitations in the event that the life of a child or an individual is protected. The right to the religious practices, principles, and beliefs is not an extension to the right to put the life of the children in danger (Guinn, 2006).
Bellamy, J (2014). When Healing Turns into Killing: Religious and Philosophical exemptions from Parental Accountability. Retrieved on 17th May 2015 from: https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/when-healing-turns-into-killing-religious-and-philosophical-exemptions-from-parental-accountability/
Cohen, A, B (2006). Spirituality in Palliative Care. Retrieved on 17th May 2015 from: http://palliativecare.medicine.duke.edu/modules/news/print.php?storyid=1
Guinn, D. E. (2006). Handbook of bioethics and religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, H (2013). Faith Healing: Religious Freedom vs, Child Protection. Retrieved on 17TH May 2015 from: https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/faith-healing-religious-freedom-vs-child-protection/
Hamburger, T & Geiger, K (2015). Healthcare provision seeks to embrace prayer treatments. Retrieved on 17th May 2015 from: http://christianscience.com/what-is-christian-science/a-closer-look-at-health/press-room-blog/healthcare-provision-seeks-to-embrace-prayer-treatments
Huguelet, P., & Koenig, H. G. (2009). Religion and spirituality in psychiatry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sloane, P. D. (2008). Essentials of family medicine. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
Zaoutis, L. B. (2007). Comprehensive pediatric hospital medicine. Philadelphia: Mosby/Elsevier.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples