Or commercial noise such as those coming from welders, carpenters, chain saw usage; and burglar alarms and anti-theft alarms installed on cars (Rodgers, 2011; Hodkinson, 2011). Noise from other traffic, aeroplanes and trains are also a major concern in Lewisham Council. Of these examples of noise, the Council has no powers over aircraft noise pollution. Similarly, the Council does register noise pollution from vehicles and other modes of public transport such as train, but it is normally ill-equipped to tackle the problem, hence the prevalence of the pollution within the council.Pesticide pollution mainly originates from a wide-ranging and confidential pest management program to all residents within the Council, local business premises and housing companies. The application of harsh chemicals to control different rodents and insects such as flies and mosquitoes usually impact negatively on the soil, water resources and air, especially when conducted in large scale (Pritam, 2011). When it rains after spraying pesticides, the rain waters normally sweep the chemical remains to water bodies within the Council. Other deposits infiltrate into the soil and harm important soil microbes, hence destroy the soil structure.As such, the Council faces the problem of reduced plant life, risks of soil erosion and air pollution. These risks are especially real because any harm to vegetative cover has a direct impact on other environmental issues such as air, water and soil (Kotsakis, 2012).Air pollution transcends pollution at construction or demolition sites, pesticide pollution. In the Council, air pollution is very serious partly because of more human activity. Regardless, there are strict laws and regulations in place by higher levels of government which enable the Council to crack down on companies and individuals who allow carbon gases to leak into the air. In spite of these controls, the massive populations in the Council and its neighbourhood continue to place huge demands on the commercial sector and public transport, thus straining its resources and causing air pollution.The use of non-renewable energy such as charcoal continues to cause domestic air pollution. The air contaminated by greenhouse gases spreads to the environment and alters the natural qualities of the sky, hence causing acid rain and threatening to aggravate the problem of global warming, irrespective of the amount of the emissions. Indoor and outdoor cases of air pollution create
Al-Najjar, B., & Anfimiadou, A., 2012. Environmental Policies and Firm Value. Business Strategy & the Environment, 21(1), pp.49-59.
Bailey, I., 2007. Market Environmentalism, New Environmental Policy Instruments, and Climate Policy in the United Kingdom and Germany. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3), pp.530-550.
Burt et al, 2011. Nitrate in United Kingdom Rivers: Policy and Its Outcomes Since 1970. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(1), pp.175-181.
Carpenter, J., 2014. Charge of the conversions. Planning, pp.14-19.
Cotton et al., 2014. Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy, 73, pp.427-438.
Dahlmann et al., 2008. Barriers to proactive environmental management in the United Kingdom: Implications for business and public policy. Journal of General Management, 33(3), pp.1-20.
Depledge, D., 2013. Whats in a name? A UK Arctic policy framework for 2013. Geographical Journal, 179(4), pp.369-372.
Hodkinson, S., 2011. The Private Finance Initiative in English Council Housing Regeneration: A Privatisation too Far? Housing Studies, 26(6), pp.911-932.
Khalastchi, R., 1999. International Environmental Law in the Courts of the United Kingdom. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 8(3), p.301.
Kotsakis, A., 2012. The Regulation of the Technical, Environmental and Health Aspects of Current Exploratory Shale Gas Extraction in the United Kingdom: Initial Lessons for the Future of European Union Energy Policy. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(3), pp.282-290.
Lees, C., 2007. Environmental Policy in the United Kingdom and Germany. German Politics, 16(1), pp.164-183.
Mio, C., & Venturelli, A., 2013. Non-financial Information About Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy in the Annual Reports of Listed Companies: Evidence from Italy and the UK. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 20(6), pp.340-358.
Morse, C.W., 1983. Environmental Regulation: Some Lessons from British Policy. California Management Review, 26(1), pp.25-36.
Pritam, A., 2011. Clear-up Act. Occupational Health, 63(2), pp.12-13.
Rodgers, C., 2011. Environmental Impact Assessment: Mapping the Interface between Agriculture, Development and the Natural Environment? Environmental Law Review, 13(2), pp.85-99.
Rostron, J., & Parry, J. 2008. The law and technique of environmental impact assessment in the United Kingdom. Environmental Quality Management, 17(4), pp.11-29.
Rostron, J., 2008. The law and regulation of waste in the United Kingdom: A review. Environmental Quality Management, 18(1), pp.47-65.
Russel et al., 2013. Reining in the executive? Delegation, evidence, and parliamentary influence on environmental public policy. Government & Policy, 31(4), pp.619-632.
Taylor et al., 2012. Selecting Policy Instruments for Better Environmental Regulation: a Critique and Future Research Agenda. Environmental Policy & Governance, 22(4), pp.268-292.
Turnpenny, J., Russel, D., & Rayner, T., 2013. The complexity of evidence for sustainable development policy: analysing the boundary work of the UK Parliamentary Environmental Audit Committee. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(4), pp.586-598.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples