The exchange of messages between people has been a common practice for ages. When it comes to the use of written exchanges of messages, emails are fast replacing the use of letter writing, both in the business world and other informal contexts. This has created the concept of email communication. Email communication is unique in its own way and rapidly becoming popular for a number of reasons. A key characteristic of email communication is that it has been found to be less formal than the use of written letters (Takahashi, 2001). This decrease in the level of formality is seen whether in terms of writing what used to be the conventional formal letters or informal letters. This is because even when used in the business world as a form of communication between subordinates and their superiors, most of the writing rules that were followed in typically written letters are no longer followed (Kasper & Rose, 2001). This notwithstanding, the fact that email communications have come to make the exchange of messages free flowing and pragmatic cannot be denied.As outlined in the introduction, pragmatics refers to the use of language in a social context (Tateyama, 2001). Generally, there are two major contexts that pragmatics fall. These are written pragmatics and spoken pragmatics. In each of these contexts, there are special features that come together to form what is known as pragmatics convention, which serves as rules governing the use of language in the social context (Kasper & Rose, 2001). As far as spoken language is concerned, it is found that this form of language has several social and regional differences and variations. That is, given the same type of language such as the English language, the way that Americans may use this language is different from how the British will use it, just as Australians will use it differently from Africans, all of who may be expressing themselves orally. This makes spoken language have much relation with pragmatics than written language (Takahashi, 2001).
(5th ed.). New York: St. Martins.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 1-9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laurence R. H. and Ward G. (2005) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 80-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tateyama, Y. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 200-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples