The present research has identified that one of the problems that the UK corporate world has undergone over the years is the confusion brought about by the uncertainty of the term in both policy and meaning. Hopkins notes that the definition of CSR in the UK has been more confusing and the political elite does not make things better. According to Hopkins, the UK definition of CSR by Nigel Griffiths, former Minister for CSR and MP shows CSR as a way of conduct that a business has when dealing with economic, social and environmental impacts that affect their operations. This allows them to maximize the benefits and minimize the demerits. Another definition noted by Hopkins was taken from the CSR group sponsored by the Department of Trade and Industry. This definition gave an account of what CSR is not rather than what it is. It defined it as a tool aimed at impacting stakeholders within the society and does not take the meaning of the immediate funds and expertise within the community but a reflection of the mission, values, impacts, and resolutions achieved within the society by the same company. This definition shows that the UK has different ways of at CSR by looking at what should not be used to measure the values and impacts this has on the society. Ideally, the role of the company, in the UK, is to extend its mission to the society and meet the main demands of the society by reflecting on the main ideas that will increase integrity as it deals with its stakeholders. The UK’s role in the EU has also been a difficult attribute amongst most of the companies as they are not sure which of the definitions to follow. The EU at first was categorical that CSR should not replace regulations and legislation when it came to corporate companies working on mitigating the risks of social and environmental growth within the society. The main aim was to use CSR as a development goal for the sake of the society by establishing legal frameworks that could define a level playing ground for all companies within the EU.
Carroll, A.B. & Shabana, K.M. (2010) "The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice," International Journal of Management Reviews, pp. 85-105.
Gill, A. (2008) "Corporate Governance as Social Responsibility: A Research Agenda", Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 452-478.
Hopkins, M. (2012) Corporate social responsibility and international development: is business the solution? New York: Earthscan.
Mullerat, R. (2010) International corporate social responsibility: the role of corporations in the economic order of the 21st century, London: Kluwer Law International.
Ward, H. & Smith, C. (2006) Corporate social responsibility at a crossroads: futures for CSR in the UK to 2015, London: Russell Press.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples