When a person falls in water, it is evident that the person would be wet. This outcome does not give any room for meddling between the person coming out of water when dry and the person coming out of water when wet. The revelation of the above action enables us to argue that absolute truth exists. While this appears to be so, many people tend to argue or stagger when issues regarding Christianity are mentioned. For instance, how much truth should a Christian except in relation to certain principle in Christianity? Analysts have observed that a division exists between Christians advocating for absolute truth and relativism. By definition, relativism subjects every issue to a person’s interpretation.The question that arises from the philosophy relativism is that how much should the society accept as the truth? Alternatively, do Christians have boundaries of accepting a given teaching as the absolute truth? The universality in the Christian teaching absolves one from the dogmas, which would rise from question “how true is true”2. The perception that one develops about a given notion is critical in making an informed judgment. However, Christians do believe in the absolute truth. Thus, the religious teachings are not subject to a given interpretation, but they should be the way they appear. In this sense, one would be able to choose what way to take. It is arguable that relativism would allow the wrong interpretation to form part of the teachings. For example, in the world, theories developed by scientists are subject to proof. On the contrary, the Christian world has theories that they accept as the absolute truth. In essence, the choice that a person makes is either wrong or right without taking the side to a given interpretation.Relativism rejects the sovereignty God and projects the truth as a notion, which a woman or a man has perceived. Ideally, when the sky, for instance, is blue then that is its color. First, the conception that one develops in relation to a given facts reveals the ideologies that the person would wish the society to accept. Unfortunately, one may initiate arguments that tend to justify a wrong issue, but the truth remains to be the truth.
Don S. Browning. Universalism Vs. Relativism: Making Moral Judgments in a Changing, Pluralistic, and Threatening World, (London: Rowman & Littlefield), 2006, pp, 131-145.
Patrick J. J. Phillips. The Challenge of Relativism: Its Nature and Limits, (New York: Continuum International Publishing Group), 2011, pp 27-47.
Steven D. Hales. A Companion to Relativism, (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons), 2011, pp 1-37.
Steven Lukes. Moral Relativism, (New York: Profile Books), 2011, pp, 1-20.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples