Social networking websites are creating a false sense of interaction. The society fosters real and meaningful kinds of relationships. They are supposed to be healthy to everyone because they act as role-shaping structures, increases the sense of belonging and the will to conquer problems. However, most of these social networks though created out of a simple idea of promoting social relationships, have been creating a wrong sense of connection (Kennedy, et al. They are among the fastest growing companies with Facebook being on the lead. They have chat rooms that enable users to communicate with each other. These chat rooms make users glued to their computer screens, as they want to find out more from their online friends. This, in turn, translates into a lot of time wasted interacting using the social sites. Natural fostering relationships arise when individuals can physically see each other. Spending most of the time online is killing the natural type of relationship. Some can claim that they are keeping in touch with their friends but the truth is that they know little about the friends they claim beyond their profile information.The real society values privacy (Kavanaugh, et al.: pp 34). However, social networking websites have made it easy for people to publicize their private information. Issues about intimacy have always been confined by the society as those meant for married people and have to be discussed in the bedroom. However, since most people are always busy with work schedules, they find it easy and nice to post such on the profile walls. While it may sound nice among friends, it can be very bad when other family members or employers find such things through such social sites. Pictures also tell a lot about who we are. Drinking, going to clubs to have fun, kissing strangers can be very nice but once posted on Facebook, they can cause other issues like divorces, job loss or disrespect among friends.“Each time we spend time on social networks, we are promoting other businesses by following links. The founders of the sites get a huge share as well.
Boyd d and Ellison N. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 2007, 13: 210–230.
Ellison, N., B., Steinflield, C., & Lampe, C. The Benefits of Face book “Friends:” Social capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of computer- Medicated Communication, 2007, 12 (4): 1143-1168.
Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. The 2009 Horizon Report, The New Media Consortium, Austin, Texas, 2009. Print.
Kavanaugh, A., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Zin, T. T., & Reese, D. D. Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2005, 10 (4), article 3.
Kennedy, G.E., Judd, T.S., Churchward, A. & Gray, K. First year learners experiences with technology: Are they digital natives? Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 2008, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 108-122.
Nie, N. H. Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 2001, 45 (3), 420–35
Paul, E., & Brier, S. Friendsickness in the transition to college: Precollege predictors and college adjustment correlates. Journal of Counseling and Development, 2001, 79 (1), 77–89.
Plant, R. Online communities‟ in Technology in Society, 2004, 26(1):51–65.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples