This council pitted two arguments against each other. The first argument is that Jesus Christ had two different natures. The first nature is that he was man, at the same time he was God. The other argument denoted that Jesus Christ only had a human body, but His soul was divine4 . On this basis, Jesus Christ is purely God, and not man God. However, a compromise was reached, with the resolution that Jesus was one Person, with two natures. On this basis, Jesus Christ performed his various roles for purposes of satisfying His God like nature, as well as for purposes of satisfying His human nature.The Council of Nicaea was greatly concerned with the identity of the divine nature of Jesus Christ. This was based on the assertions of a leading Scholar and future Bishop of Alexandria, Arius that Christ was just a human being like us, and He is a creation of God. On this basis, Jesus Christ is a subordinate of God. The resolutions of the council of Nicaea are contained in the Nicene Creed. This resolution denotes that the church believes in God, who is the Father, and the creator of all things, that which are invisible, and that which are visible5 . The members of this council also believed in Jesus Christ, who is God’s Son, and Begotten. Furthermore, this council believed that Jesus Christ is the Light of Light, a substance of God the Father, and He was born, and not created, and through Him, everything in earth and heaven were made. This Creed goes on to denote that Jesus Christ came from Heaven, because of our salvation, and became man, incarnate. He suffered, was killed, and on the third day, Jesus Christ rose again from the dead, ascending into heaven, and will come back to pass judgment on the dead, as well as on the living, and this is through the Holy Spirit6.Furthermore, the Creed goes on to denote that whoever says that there was a time when Jesus Christ did not exist, are misguided, and these people, the Church does not tolerate them. This is because they oppose God, and the scriptures of God7 . This Creed further goes on to denote that the church will not recognize anyone who holds the view that Jesus Christ, God’s Son is mutable, and can change. By carefully analyzing this creed from the council of Nicaea, we can denote that it has some of the elements that make up the logos Christology. For instance, Scholar denotes that
Ayres, L. (2010). Augustine and the Trinity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairbairn, D. (2003). Grace and Christology in the early church. Oxford: Oxford University
Freeman, A. (2003). Theodulf of Orle̓ans: Charlemagnes spokesman against the Second Council
of Nicaea. Aldershot [England: Ashgate/Variorum.
Giakalis, A. (2005). Images of the divine the theology of icons at the Seventh Ecumenical
Council (Rev. ed.). Leiden: Brill.
McGregor, R. R. (2013). Correspondence on Christology and grace. Washington, D.C.: Catholic
University of America Press.
Noll, M. A. (2012). Turning points: decisive moments in the history of Christianity (3rd ed.).
Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic.
Price, R. (2005). The acts of the Council of Chalcedon. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Samuel, V. C. (2001). The Council of Chalcedon re-examined. Philadelphia, PA?: Xlibris.
Tanner, N. (2011). The church in council conciliar movements, religious practice and the papacy
from Nicaea to Vatican II. London: I.B. Tauris.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples