This made it possible to gain access to reliable information sources relevant to benefits and challenges associated with flextime implementation. Articles were also acquired through conventional internet search, through use of key word flextime and employee performance. This report discusses the diverse metrics of employee performance, that is, productivity, morale, absenteeism, and turnover within the context of flextime implementation. The report also evaluates these performance indices, as depicted by companies that have implemented the flextime program. It further analyzes possible benefits of a flextime program, while presenting recommendations, showing why Madison Supply Company should implement it and how maximum efficacy of the program can be achieved.Productivity is deemed one of the key determinants of employee performance. According to research conducted by Kelliher’s (2011) on companies like Centrica, Lehman Brothers, and KPMG, among others, there was a strong correlation between flexible work schedules and employee productivity. Kelliher’s (2011) also showed that only a small percentage of individual participants in the target corporations associated flexible work schedules with a negative impact on their productivity and overall performance. Clear understanding of the positive effects of flexible work programs on productivity should make it possible for organizations like the Madison Supply Company to deal effectively with managerial or even individual employee resistance to flexible working. Understanding how flexible working improves productivity also paves way for innovation of the most effective methods or approaches to work. (Grzywacz, Casey &. BEIT 336 (Formal Report).
Ala-Mursula, L., Vahtera, J., Kivimaki, M., Kevin, M., & Pentti, J. (2002). Employee control over working times: associations with subjective health and sickness absences. in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(4), 272-279.
Altman, M. & Golden, L. (2007). The Economics of Flexible Work Scheduling: Theoretical Advances and Paradoxes”, in B. Rubin (ed.). Research in the Sociology of Work, 17, 313–342.
Askenazy, P. (2004). Shorter Work Time, Hours Flexibility and Labor Intensification. Eastern Economic Journal, 30(4), 603-614.
Barnett, C., & Hall,T. (2001). How to use reduced hours to win the war for talent. Organizational Dynamics, 29(3), 192-211.
Batt, R., & Valcour, M. (2003). Human resource practices as predictors of work-family outcomes and turnover. Industrial Relations, 42(2), 189-219.
Beers, T. (2000). Flexible Schedules and Shift Work, Replacing the 9-to-5 Workday? Monthly Labor Review, 123(6), 33-40.
Casey, R.., & Grzywacz, G. (2008). Employee health and well-being: the role of flexibility and work family Balance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11(1), 31-47.
Eldridge, D., & Nisar, M. (2011). Employee and Organizational Impacts of Flexitime Work Arrangements. Relations industries, 66(2) 213-234.
Grzywacz, G.; Casey, R, & Jones, A. (2007). The effects of workplace flexibility on health behaviors: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 49(12), 1302-1309 .
Hornung, S., Rousseau, M., & Glaser, J. (2008). Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals”, in Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 655-664.
Kelliher, C. (2011). Working Families Flexible Working and Performance. Retrieved 24 June 2014 fromhttp://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/dinamic-content/media/WF-DA%20Flex%20Working%20Report.pdf
Meyer, S., Mukerjee, S., Sestero, A. (2001). Work-Family benefits: Which ones maximize profits? Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(1), 28-44.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples