To illustrate this kind of attitude, he gave the example of the Biblical account of the Jews who did not at first took to the exhortation of Moses to lead them towards freedom from their slavery in Egypt. The second one is through violence in which he wrote was not only impractical but also, immoral. Finally, the third choice, the use of non-violent resistance, in which he clearly advocated the middle way between the first two choices presented. Martin Luther King uses mainly literary, anecdotal and philosophical supporting examples and arguments to present his case for advocacy of non-violent resistance. While mostly value statements (appeal to morality and religious values), rather than strict facts are used to prop up his theory or position, King presented his material in such a way that it is organized and progressively logical, where the first two ways of meeting oppression were systematically dealt with arguments that effectively destroyed their appeal to his intended audience, the Negroes and other peoples who would potentially rally or support their cause in having equal rights. The purpose of the piece is to provide a highly personal view of the situation that was facing the Negroes at a time when the blacks were feeling oppressed due to a racial segregation policy that made them politically and socially inferior to the white majority. Martin Luther King's Three Ways of Meeting Oppression.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples