The Whiskey Boys gained sympathies from western Maryland in which Governor Thomas Lee had to stop a small rebellion. Then there was another rebellion in Virginia but was suppressed by Virginia governor “Light Horse Harry” Lee. Richard Howell of New Jersey met a small force so easily with his efficient militia. The states had to mobilize a force of 14,000 to be sent to the mountains. Food and supplies became a problem. The militia had to be formed as the Constitutional Convention did not want to create a United States military force because it was against the principles of liberty. Washington named the assembled force the Army of the Constitution with “Light Horse Harry” Lee in charge. The lesson from the pockets of rebellion was that the United States protected itself by forming militias and despite these being disorganized they could be used to establish armies. The Whiskey War proved that campaigns can be won with a large force (Vandiver, 2005, p. 4).The American Civil War The American Civil War was for absolute change; the Southern States aimed for separation or absolute independence, while the Northern States aimed for the absolute union. The causes and circumstances involved were somewhat related with Haiti’s Declaration of Independence. American Conflicts.
Catton, B. (1986). America goes to war: The civil war and its meaning in American culture. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
Clavin, M. (2007). American Toussaints: Symbol, subversion, and the black Atlantic tradition in the American civil war. Slavery and Abolition, 28(1), 87-113.
Defensetech: U.S. to test seabed resupply systems by 2016. Retrieved from http://defensetech.org/2014/04/21/u-s-to-test-seabed-resupply-systems-by-2016/
Gongora, T. & Riekhoff, H. von. (2000). Introduction: Sizing up the revolution in military affairs. In T. Gongora & H. von Riekhoff (Eds.), Toward a revolution in military affairs?: Defense and security at the dawn of the twenty-first century (pp. 1-20). New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Mack, A. (1975). Why big nations lose small wars: The politics of asymmetric conflict. World Politics, 27(2), 175-200. Retrieved from : http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009880
Metz, S. (2006). America’s defense transformation: A conceptual and political history. Defense Studies, 6(1), 1-25.
Morris, R. (1969). Ending the American revolution: Lessons for our time. Journal of Peace Research, 6(4), 349-357.
Murray, W. & Knox, M. (2001). Thinking about revolutions in warfare. In M. Knox & W. Murray (Eds.), The dynamics of military revolution, 1300-2050 (pp. 1-12). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Protheroe, G. (2008). Limiting America’s engagement: Roger Hilsman’s Vietnam war, 1961-1963. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 19(2), 253-288. doi: 10.1080/09592290802096315
Rogers, C. (2000). “Military revolutions” and “Revolutions in military affairs”: A historian’s perspective. In T. Gongora & H. von Riekhoff (Eds.), Toward a revolution in military affairs?: Defense and security at the dawn of the twenty-first century (pp. 21-40). New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Schuman, H. & Corning, A. (2006). Comparing Iraq to Vietnam: Recognition, recall, and the nature of cohort effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(1), 78-87.
Vandiver, F. (2005). How America goes to war. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Wells, T. (2005). The war within: America’s battle over Vietnam. iUniverse, Inc.
Worley, R. (2005). Shaping U.S. military forces: Revolution or relevance after the cold war. Lulu.com.
Young, A. (2011). American historians confront “The transforming hand of revolution”. In A. Young & G. Nobles (Eds.), Whose American revolution was it?: Historians interpret the founding (pp. 13-114). New York: New York University Press.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples