Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Analysis of Violating 4th and 5th Amendments Essay Example

Show related essays

Analysis of Violating 4th and 5th Amendments

Analysis of Violating 4th and 5th Amendments. This case helps to determine whether both the fourth and the fifth Amendments were violated by police. In the Fifth Amendment, Terry v. Ohio gives policemen the right to conduct a Terry stop which requires an individual to validly stop in order to offer identification to the officer in charge of investigations. Many courts, therefore, consider this identification requirement not to violate the self-incrimination privilege of the Fifth Amendment. On the other hand, there is no violation of the Fourth Amendment if an officer makes a warrantless custodial detain of the suspect, for violating a misdemeanor punishable by a fine. Courts support this argument by using increased litigation as a reason behind it (Seth, 2009).

It is true that officer McFadden would have been able to detain Mr. Terry because he had the authority to stop him and demand identification under Terry v. Ohio, 393 U.S. 1 (1968). In this case, stopping Mr. Terry is supported by a reasonable suspicion and therefore the identification demanded by the officer did not by any chance violate the Fifth Amendment. According to the context of Terry stop, identification is not incrimination but it can be incriminating if a person is needed to identify oneself with several criminal activities such as illegal activity or organization participation (Seth, 2009).
   Gail Atwater was arrested by a police officer and kept in custody for driving across the street without wearing seatbelts. She was then taken to court where it pleaded her guilty for violating seatbelt law. Afterward, Atwater filed a lawsuit against the officer claiming that her warrantless custodial detain violated the Fourth Amendment’s exclusion against unreasonable seizure. But the court disagreed with her due to a reason for increased litigation (Seth, 2009).Through increased litigation, court claim that it would be impossible to suppress evidence in civil lawsuits for damages and criminal cases, both based on contentions that a forceful need for a custodial detain did not exist.    
 . Analysis of Violating 4th and 5th Amendments.


Seth. (2009, Jan 8). Atwater v. city of lago vista. Retrieved from http://www.4lawnotes.com/criminal-procedure-case-briefs/1145-atwater-v-city-lago-vista.html
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Law, Culture, Media
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Law, Archaeology, Sociology
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Analysis of Violating 4th and 5th Amendments
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples