This will be in terms of the societal exploration and exploitation of nature in everyday life; for example, the classification of plants for nutritional, medicinal, and aesthetic purposes. To an ethno scientist, marriage in the society provides a situation in which a blend of natural knowledge will arise through incorporation of the different experiences and knowledge of the two or more people who have been raised in different environment endowed with different plant, animals and other natural features influencing people’s beliefs and knowledge (Percival, 1966). An ethno scientist will conclude that the marriage in the society can help reorganize these peculiar societal knowledge and create a new set of beliefs and practices. The different systems of knowledge coming together necessitate erosion and assertion of new concepts. Since there are many concepts studied by ethno science, the marriage in the society will actually influence some of them (Sanga & Ortalli, 2003). In ethno botany, which involves the societal beliefs on the use of plants and their different roles in the improvement of human life, marriage will ensure that either one of the parties involved gets to learn more about the use of a plant or gets to learn about a totally new plant’s use (Dasgupta & Sarkar, 2005). For instance, various communities use plants in doing several things; this knowledge cannot be known by others, unless there is a very intimate association of two people who come from different societies, possibly by means of marriage. Different communities have used plants for several reasons; they have been used as a cure for snake’s venom, in soaring milk, as well as dyes and cosmetics (Percival, 1966). An ethno scientist will also view marriage in the society as an accelerating factor for environmental exploitation. There is a very close relation between environmental usage and ethno science. Human beings are in constant use of the environment and disturb natural balance in satisfying their needs. In the
Dasgupta, S., & Sarkar, A. (2005). Reflection of Ethno-Science: Study on the Abujh Maria. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
Ferraro, G. P., & Andreatta, S. (2009). Cultural Anthropology: An Applied Perspective. Belmont: Cengage Learning.
Kaplan, D. (2007). Anthropological Theory. Chicago: Transaction Publishers.
Kottak, C. P. (2008). Cultural Anthropology. McGraw-Hill.
Moore, A. (1998). Cultural Anthropology: The Field Study of Human Beings. California: Rowman & Littlefield.
Percival, K. (1966). Ethnoscience: a symposium presented at the 1966 Meeting of the Central States Anthropological Society. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Sanga, G., & Ortalli, G. (2003). Nature knowledge: Ethnoscience, Cognition, and Utility. Berghahn Books.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples