Law Case Study

In the present case, the change of date of payment 5 days later from the original term is not very substantial and may substitute the 10-day period delivery payment of the original offer unless objected to by the offeror.The acceptance made by the offeree is, therefore, valid because it was made within the time frame specified by the offeror for the offer to stand notwithstanding the alteration in the date of payment. This is because the offer, by its terms, intended to make a contract and is

On the counter offer by Computerland to Cwmfelin University dated 1st September, the Cwmfelin University sent them an offer, which demanded the delivery of 50 Computers by 15th September, at 200 Pounds per machine, as opposed to 220 Pounds mentioned in the invitation by Computerland.

In a majority 7 – 2 ruling the US Supreme Court held that the laws of Texas had breached Roe’s constitutional right to privacy. The right to undergo an abortion is founded on the constitutional right to privacy (Roe v Wade, 1973). The US Supreme Court ruling in Roe v Wade resulted in the enactment of legislation relating to abortion in the US.  

In the case of Jami Jensen, who is a black American, it is notable that the new environment is not favourable at all. This is because there are different illegal issues relating to human sexuality and employment. For one, it is advisable not to accept an offer when one is suspicious of fishy undertakings.  

To compute taxable income, the tax law makes a distinction between income and capital receipts. Your taxable income shall include your PAYG payment from Compass, dividends from west point, capital assets gain from the sale of the estate, termination of the distribution agreement and business income from the distribution of widgets.Under the PAYG system, tax is deducted by the employer from the gross salary, who pays it to the ATO. This would cover your tax liability if you had no other source

They share the profits equally though Jenny works full time in the business and does not receive a salary while John works irregularly on weekends.This business is failing in its operation. In addition, the relationships between the two partners deteriorate. They decide to dissolve the business, and ask their solicitor to terminate the partnership. However, the two partners continue to operate the business much the same way as before dissolution. In effect, this implies that the partnership has

This has reflected in the national legal systems which have evolved over the years to include various corporate laws and principles.Conflict of interest has been an issue that was prohibited and restricted by Common Law. In Cook V Deeks3 it was held that directors of a company will have to act in the best interest of the company. And where they subjugated the companys interest in favour of a personal interest of some of the directors, a fraud is committed on the shareholders who stand to lose

Raj’s dismissal does not meet any of these conditions set out in the law. Therefore, the employer’s argument that Raj’s behaviour amounted to a case of gross misconduct has no legal basis. Oftentimes, cases of employee misconduct may involve being intolerant towards a fellow workmate, customer or damaging company assets. Raj’s behaviour constituted none of these. In addition, the employer’s failure to investigate the case before effecting the dismissal was unfair because he violated

Opening fire first showed cowardice among the police. The best action would have been to order the boy to throw away any weapon he had and come out with his hand raised. None of this happened; if it did the witnesses would have said it in the report. Opening rounds aimlessly in a residential estate was unacceptable. 

Donoghue, which further made her ill and diagnosed with gastroenteritis by a doctor. The incident subsequently took Mrs. Donoghue to charge legal case against the manufacturer of the particular ginger beer i. She also lodged a court order in the Court of Sessions with seeking £500 as a damage2.The claim lodged by Mrs. Donoghue was successfully accepted by the Scotland’s highest civil court. The precedents made by Lord of Atkins were further observed to form a number of legal policies for the

27, 1973 where the later argued that he was still preparing to receive the cattle where Wendling requested additional down payment that Puls refused and suggested that Wendling should sell the cattle to someone else (Wendling v. Wendling told Puls that he would need a written release from them in order to initiate another sales agreement. The duo did not give Wendling a written release prompting Wendling to write a notice to them on September 11, 1973. Neither Puls nor Watson responded to the

The contract is not void because there is a clear will during the acceptance of fish. There is also no mutual mistake since the fish on arrival raises issues of hygiene (Markesinis, 2006).There is a corresponding order to store the fish in the right place and the correct manner.On offering Fundi to work and to create the terms and conditions that include the time frame and the amount of cash that he receives are enough grounds that tend to indicate the formation of the agreement. Therefore, any

The judge held that the categorization of the transaction as a sale of description was not capable of being displaced by reference to the issue of reliance. In that, the name of the painter in the goods constituted a substantial ingredient in the identification of the goods.In their reasoning on the case, Slade LJ and Nourse L.J he indicated that the case was put in two basis where the first was that there was a sale of contract of goods by description and a breach of the condition. The

Under the stipulation of RFRA does it exercise this religion (Gan 2, Ginsburg 8)?vi Therefore, by following the stipulations complained of, is the corporation being stopped from exercising its religion or say, worshipping the way it used to do before? It is easy to argue that secular organizations can also observe religious activities such as closing down on the Sabbath, but this is not a straight forward issue especially with regards to heterogeneity of the workforce (Ginsburg 7, Gans 2). The

The first franchise that offers you their name has an excellent offer. However, the fact that you are taking up their name may harbor some disadvantages as they could hinder your development. They may also drag you along with them when their business takes the wrong turn. Hence starting up a coffee shop with the second franchise would be the best for you if you are truly out for success of the company.Each business or enterprise with a serious and promising name or a title is surely one of a

Together with the school district appealed the ruling thereby requesting the court of appeal to increase the number of judges on the bench to hear the case afresh. The Ninth Circuit refused could not rehear the case but offered a new opinion, which affirmed the ban on the recitation in school but omitted a section that had previously declared the entire pledge unconstitutional.The Supreme Court revoked Ninth Circuits decision that had refused to increase the number of judges on the bench to

This is the test on whether the continuation of the business depends on the service being offered. If the service being offered is important for the going concern of the entity, then the person doing the service is considered an employee rather than an independent contractor. In this case, the service being offered is crucial to the continuation of the business of Uber. Therefore, using this test alone, the drivers will be considered to be independent contractors.The second test that the jury

The respondent in the case owns clothing stores under the brand names of Abercrombie Kids, Abercrombie and Fitch and Hollister. The plaintiff is Samantha, who is represented by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Samantha Elauf is a Muslim, who applied for a position in the company as a model at an Abercrombie Kids store that was under the management of the respondent in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The company has a “look policy” and require every employee to comply with this look policy.

Employment contract of Grace and Taylor are outlining the employees duties in terms of setting up potential operational targets. In addition, new recruit have to be informed about the particulars of pension scheme of the firms and other additional payments. The statement should be outlining probationary period applied on new recruits. Such contract papers will disseminate the details of termination, regulation and accusation policies of Grace and Taylor (Cohen & Lou, 2012).The UK legislation is

The charges against him were of espionage and conspiracy of committing it. In such cases violating the law can mean a possible punishment of life in prison and some cases death. After Hansens arrest, the FBI agents started investigation and search of his residence, cars, and workplace for more evidence. His primary motive for committing these crimes was money as he took a significant amount of it from the Russians.The affidavit provided as evidence in the case against Hansen gives an account of